Role: Head UX/UI Designer

Timeline: 4 months

TERRAFirme

Developing an Accessible Risk Reporting App: AI-Powered Image Recognition for Civil Defense's Landslide Risk Identification in Dense Urban Areas



Developing an Accessible Risk Reporting App: AI-Powered Image Recognition for Civil Defense's Landslide Risk Identification in Dense Urban Areas



Developing an Accessible Risk Reporting App: AI-Powered Image Recognition for Civil Defense's Landslide Risk Identification in Dense Urban Areas



The Challenge.

In light of the significant loss of lives, with approximately 1,500 fatalities attributed to landslides in Brazil over the past 10 years, my objective was to develop a solution that tackles this grave issue. By prioritizing effective identification of landslide risks and improving reporting and communication processes, the aim was to enable timely intervention by civil defense authorities.

  • Short onboarding with the options to learn landslide warning signs


  • Includes images to help users see real life examples

Quick and easy sign in

  • Short onboarding with the options to learn landslide warning signs


  • Includes images to help users see real life examples

  • Short onboarding with the options to learn landslide warning signs


  • Includes images to help users see real life examples

Quick and easy sign in

  • Users with visual or cognitive impairments can utilize Assisted Reporting or 360° Reports feature to identify landslide risk signs in their homes. Allowing new segments of the population to actively report risks.


  • Assisted Reporting utilizes a pre-trained AI model to identify 45° cracks on walls in pictures taken by users.


  • 360° Reports enables users with visual impairments to "hear" cracks using voiceover and a pre-trained AI model, allowing them to actively report landslide risks.


Allowing users with cognitive and physical disabilities to have assisted reporting

  • Users with visual or cognitive impairments can utilize Assisted Reporting or 360° Reports feature to identify landslide risk signs in their homes. Allowing new segments of the population to actively report risks.


  • Assisted Reporting utilizes a pre-trained AI model to identify 45° cracks on walls in pictures taken by users.


  • 360° Reports enables users with visual impairments to "hear" cracks using voiceover and a pre-trained AI model, allowing them to actively report landslide risks.


Allowing users with cognitive and physical disabilities to have assisted reporting

  • Shortening the flow from the moment of risk analyzed to the final report being made.


  • Allows users to maintain awareness of their communities risk levels while incentivizing a culture of vigilance of current environment.


  • Notifications of “are you sure you don't want to report” Allow users to rethink choices eventually report a risk.

Notifications on identified risks in images and/or awareness of local reports

  • Shortening the flow from the moment of risk analyzed to the final report being made.


  • Allows users to maintain awareness of their communities risk levels while incentivizing a culture of vigilance of current environment.


  • Notifications of “are you sure you don't want to report” Allow users to rethink choices eventually report a risk.

Notifications on identified risks in images and/or awareness of local reports

The Solution

  • Quick and easy flow to report signs of risk


  • Allows users to send multiple pictures. Autofill of previously given information accelerates the fill out process.

Creating a fast and efficient way to report

The Solution

  • Quick and easy flow to report signs of risk


  • Allows users to send multiple pictures. Autofill of previously given information accelerates the fill out process.

  • Quick and easy flow to report signs of risk


  • Allows users to send multiple pictures. Autofill of previously given information accelerates the fill out process.

Creating a fast and efficient way to report

Creating a fast and efficient way to report

  • Citizens located in gang/ militia dominated areas are able to anonymously report risk without being blamed for the report.

  • Allows members of own family to report problems in a household worried about risk


  • Gives data on locations not very accessible before

Allowing for anonymous reporting

  • Citizens located in gang/ militia dominated areas are able to anonymously report risk without being blamed for the report.

  • Allows members of own family to report problems in a household worried about risk


  • Gives data on locations not very accessible before

Allowing for anonymous reporting

The Secondary Research

The Secondary Research

The importance of quality data for landslide early warning systems

My research included:


Getting wide angle understanding of the causes of landslides

Understanding the main issued that arise in the prevention of landslide

Common issues with prevention technologies today

The populations relationship with reporting risks

Ways to identify landslide risk



Initially having gone into the research with an extremely generalist approach i felt very much worried about the inconsistency in the subject matter id finding important information on. Fortunately many of the articles and research papers pointed me into the very interesting direction. I first choose to go extremely generalist because we were indeed going in into this with the goal to solve an actual problem that the civil defense had. To truly comprehend the scale of the problem and its complexities studied areas slightly out of topic made witch made perfect sense of researching about because later in my research was able to validade the final research and understand the true value i was bringing to this urging problem

Discoveries

Prevention

Prevention efforts are done defensively in most cases

Soil types vary and difficult prevention efforts

Depending on the risk level and time given, prevention efforts can be done using trees and not retaining walls

Schools in Brazil don't have natural disaster education as a mandatory activity

The list of signs of risk is given out via pan-flit form

Organized visits to schools initiated on the behalf of civil defense have shown increased reporting amongst children's parents

Education

Although most systems were effective they were too expensive to place

Low precision on timing of evacuation difficult efficacy of prevention efforts



Current systems to report signs of landslides are limited by phone calls

Current systems

Satellites monitoring land shifts offer a potential solution for detecting hazards, but their single-pixel size, typically around one square meter, limits their ability to visualize detailed features like cracks on rooftops or cracks on vertical structures like walls. Despite the existence of early warning sensor technologies, their high costs and challenges in widespread implementation on densely occupied hills make them less feasible.

Interviews

How have apps/services facilitated the transfer of information to organizations?


How have similar apps incentivized engagement to report?


What new market trends or technological advancements are my competitors leveraging?

Goal of the analysis

Competitive analysis

  • Some products automated irregularity detection in movement.

  • Interactive maps enhanced the sense of security in many products.

  • A diverse range of input options was available initially.

Strength

  • Lack of visual hierarchy or contrasting colors affected clarity.

  • Chat features in some products became ineffective due to message overload.

  • Attempting to address multiple issues resulted in a useless outcome.

Weaknesses

  • Some products incorporated features to aid communication with first responders.

  • Majority lacked engagement, while some gamified the experience.

  • Enhanced customizability for users with disabilities was desired in many cases.

Opportunities

  • Implementing AI or sensors, as demonstrated in Apple's fall detection

  • Gamification may attract users, but it also has the potential to be borderline offensive.

  • Some apps already possess substantial user data.

Threats

Initially, we faced uncertainty about the competitors in the space and the potential benefits of conducting a competitive analysis. However, we decided to break down the analysis into various services and prioritize their key features, particularly focusing on education, identification, and communication of risks. Fortunately, conducting the competitive analysis proved to be highly beneficial. Among the 45 products and services we examined, we were able to identify a few that sparked the leading idea for our final product.

My Shake app

Citizen app

Fixmystreet.brussels

Reportesmed app

FEMA app

Redes Socias

My Shake

Reportemed

SeeClickFix

mPERS Device

Onde Tem Tiroteio

Fall Detection

Apps

Produtos

Apps

Notifications

Instructions on risk assessment

Input options

Inclusivity

Some form of autonomy

Visual clarity and hierarchy

Interview questions that I came up with based on my secondary research:


  • What is your relationship with landslides? how have they affected you? or have you affected them?

  • How do you deal with safety measures inside your home?

  • Do you know the signs of risk of a landslide?

  • Is search and rescue more important than prevention on a large scale?

  • What would you say is the largest contributor to the prevention of landslides?

  • What can the population do to keep themselves safe?

Interview questions that I came up with based on my secondary research:


  • What is your relationship with landslides? how have they affected you? or have you affected them?

  • How do you deal with safety measures inside your home?

  • Do you know the signs of risk of a landslide?

  • Is search and rescue more important than prevention on a large scale?

  • What would you say is the largest contributor to the prevention of landslides?

  • What can the population do to keep themselves safe?

The amount of research invested in identifying stakeholders for this project was tremendous. We interviewed 17 individuals, including victims, geologists, the Secretary of Civil Defense, and the Director of the Red Cross. It was an eye-opening experience to meticulously interview each and every person involved in this significant problem.


􀆄

end

􀌣

flip

􀊳

mute

􀍺

effects

􀍎

Camera Off

􀊩

Speaker

Interviews

Affinity mapping

After carefully reviewing the extensive collection of notes we had accumulated, my partner and I diligently sorted and categorized them into major groups. Initially, we separated our findings from government officials and the general population into two distinct groups. Further classification was done based on themes related to prevention, communication, behavior, worries, and critiques. However, in the final analysis, we consolidated these groups into three overarching categories: prevention, communication, and behavior. T

Data on first person reports, Accessibility and lack of ways to report a risk were hinging efforts immensely.

My final research findings

The civil defense wasn't very efficient in the sharing of information, especially signs of risk

Some victims felt neglected and forgotten about in some areas and said they never were warned of anything.

Directed people to their phone number for any reports (199)

Communication

Older citizens and disabled of the population didn't have ways of reporting through phone call

People were either too lazy to report risks or were scared about the consequences of reporting

Not everyone is able to memorize/ visualize signs of risk

Accesability

A lack of knowledge and urgency dis motivated users

The population never thought it could happened to them even after happening next door

Autonomous systems do work. Why don't they exist in a field so crucial for survival?

Behavior

“The majority of citizens don't want to spend a second avoiding something thats never directly affected them” - USER #3

“ The people that spent more time inside their homes either dont know how to report or have difficulty reporting due to disabilitiese/age etc.” USER #8

“ People are truly worried of telling us and having to evacuate their only thing they consider theirs on this earth. ” USER #10

“ If citizens were actually aware of risks and reported them we would have prevented so much suffering from landslides ” USER #10

Field Research

Visits to the Civil Defense to understand what they currently do on the prevention side

Discoveries

Prevention

Prevention efforts are done defensively in most cases

Soil types vary and difficult prevention efforts

Depending on the risk level and time given, prevention efforts can be done using trees and not retaining walls

Schools in Brazil don't have natural disaster education as a mandatory activity

The list of signs of risk is given out via pan-flit form

Organized visits to schools initiated on the behalf of civil defense have shown increased reporting amongst children's parents

Education

Although most systems were effective they were too expensive to place

Low precision on timing of evacuation difficult efficacy of prevention efforts



Current systems to report signs of landslides are limited by phone calls

Current systems

Interviews

My Shake app

Citizen app

Fixmystreet.

brussels

Reportesmed app

Some products automated irregularity detection in movement.

Interactive maps enhanced the sense of security in many products.

A diverse range of input options was available initially.

Strength

Lack of visual hierarchy or contrasting colors affected clarity.

Chat feature in some products became ineffective due to message overload.

Attempting to address multiple issues resulted in a useless outcome.

Weeknesses

Some products incorporated features to aid communication with first responders.

Majority lacked engagement, while some gamified the experience.

Enhanced customizability for users with disabilities was desired in many cases.

Opportunities

Implementing AI or sensors, as demonstrated in Apple's fall detection

Gameification may attract users, but it also has the potential to be borderline offensive.

Some apps already possess substantial user data.

Threats

FEMA

app

Redes

Socias

My Shake

Reportemed

SeeClickFix

mPERS

Device

Onde Tem

Tiroteio

Fall

Detection

Apps

Produtos

Apps

Notifications

Instructions

on risk

assessment

Input

options

Inclusivity

Some form

of autonomy

Visual

clarity and

hierarchy

How have apps/services facilitated the transfer of information to organizations?


How have similar apps incentivized engagement to report?


What new market trends or technological advancements are my competitors leveraging?

Goal of the analysis

Competitive analysis

Initially, we faced uncertainty about the competitors in the space and the potential benefits of conducting a competitive analysis. However, we decided to break down the analysis into various services and prioritize their key features, particularly focusing on education, identification, and communication of risks. Fortunately, conducting the competitive analysis proved to be highly beneficial. Among the 45 products and services we examined, we were able to identify a few that sparked the leading idea for our final product.

Discoveries

Prevention

Prevention efforts are done defensively in most cases

Soil types vary and difficult prevention efforts

Depending on the risk level and time given, prevention efforts can be done using trees and not retaining walls

Schools in Brazil don't have natural disaster education as a mandatory activity

The list of signs of risk is given out via pan-flit form

Organized visits to schools initiated on the behalf of civil defense have shown increased reporting amongst children's parents

Education

Although most systems were effective they were too expensive to place

Low precision on timing of evacuation difficult efficacy of prevention efforts



Current systems to report signs of landslides are limited by phone calls

Current systems

Interview questions that i came up with based on my secondary research:


What is your relationship with landslides? how have they affected you? or you affected them?

How do you deal safety measure inside your home?

do you know the signs of risk of a landslide?

Is search and rescue more important than prevention on a large scale?

What would you say is the largest contributors to the prevention of landslides?

What can the population do to keep themselves safe?

The amount of research invested in identifying stakeholders for this project was tremendous. We interviewed 17 individuals, including victims, geologists, the Secretary of Civil Defense, and the Director of the Red Cross. It was an eye-opening experience to meticulously interview each and every person involved in this significant problem.


􀆄

end

􀌣

flip

􀊳

mute

􀍺

effects

􀍎

Camera Off

􀊩

Speaker

Interviews

Field Research

Visits to the Civil Defense to understand what they currently do on the prevention side

Affinity mapping

After carefully reviewing the extensive collection of notes we had accumulated, my partner and I diligently sorted and categorized them into major groups. Initially, we separated our findings from government officials and the general population into two distinct groups. Further classification was done based on themes related to prevention, communication, behavior, worries, and critiques. However, in the final analysis, we consolidated these groups into three overarching categories: prevention, communication, and behavior. T

The civil defense wasn't very efficient in the sharing of information, especially signs of risk

Some victims felt neglected and forgotten about in some areas and said they never were warned of anything.

Directed people to their phone number for any reports (199)

Communication

Older citizens and disabled of the population didn't have ways of reporting through phone call

Not everyone is able to memorize/ visualize signs of risk

Accesability

Autonomous systems do work. Why don't they exist in a field so crucial for survival?

People were either too lazy to report risks or were scared about the consequences of reporting

A lack of knowledge and urgency dis motivated users

The population never thought it could happened to them even after happening next door

Behavior

My final research findings

Data on first person reports, Accessibility and lack of ways to report a risk were hinging efforts immensely.

The civil defense wasn't very efficient in the sharing of information, especially signs of risk

Some victims felt neglected and forgotten about in some areas and said they never were warned of anything.

Directed people to their phone number for any reports (199)

Communication

Older citizens and disabled of the population didn't have ways of reporting through phone call

Not everyone is able to memorize/ visualize signs of risk

Accesability

Autonomous systems do work. Why don't they exist in a field so crucial for survival?

People were either too lazy to report risks or were scared about the consequences of reporting

A lack of knowledge and urgency dis motivated users

The population never thought it could happened to them even after happening next door

Behavior

My final research findings

Data on first person reports, Accessibility and lack of ways to report a risk were hinging efforts immensely.

Interviews

Implementing AI or sensors, as demonstrated in Apple's fall detection

Gameification may attract users, but it also has the potential to be borderline offensive.

Some apps already possess substantial user data.

Threats

Some products incorporated features to aid communication with first responders.

Majority lacked engagement, while some gamified the experience.

Enhanced customizability for users with disabilities was desired in many cases.

Opportunities

Lack of visual hierarchy or contrasting colors affected clarity.

Chat feature in some products became ineffective due to message overload.

Attempting to address multiple issues resulted in a useless outcome.

Weeknesses

Some products automated irregularity detection in movement.

Interactive maps enhanced the sense of security in many products.

A diverse range of input options was available initially.

Strength

My Shake app

Citizen app

Fixmystreet.

brussels

Reportesmed app

How have apps/services facilitated the transfer of information to organizations?


How have similar apps incentivized engagement to report?


What new market trends or technological advancements are my competitors leveraging?

Goal of the analysis

Competitive analysis

Initially, we faced uncertainty about the competitors in the space and the potential benefits of conducting a competitive analysis. However, we decided to break down the analysis into various services and prioritize their key features, particularly focusing on education, identification, and communication of risks. Fortunately, conducting the competitive analysis proved to be highly beneficial. Among the 45 products and services we examined, we were able to identify a few that sparked the leading idea for our final product.

Apps

Apps

Onde Tem

Tiroteio

Fall

Detection

Notifications

Instructions on risk assessment

Input options

Some form of autonomy

Visual clarity and hierarchy

Inclusivity

Apps

Apps

FEMA app

Redes Socias

My Shake

Notifications

Instructions on risk assessment

Input options

Some form of autonomy

Visual clarity and hierarchy

Inclusivity

Apps

Apps

Reportemed

SeeClickFix

mPERS

Device

Notifications

Instructions on risk assessment

Input options

Some form of autonomy

Visual clarity and hierarchy

Inclusivity

Biggest Setback

Biggest Setback

We put too much value on a the wrong group of people at the wrong time. During a significant part of our research process, my partner and I gained a profound understanding of the value and true essence of empathy. Initially, our plan was to engage with as many victims as possible, aiming to grasp their firsthand experiences and learn how the system could have better prevented such catastrophes. However, after facing several denials, we realized the delicate nature of the subject. It became evident to us that empathy could be cultivated not only through direct interaction with the afflicted but also through comprehending the experiences and efforts of other stakeholders. This included those working to combat the issue, individuals living with the constant fear of imminent danger, as well as activists and researchers dedicated to preventing such incidents from recurring.


We put too much value on a the wrong group of people at the wrong time. During a significant part of our research process, my partner and I gained a profound understanding of the value and true essence of empathy. Initially, our plan was to engage with as many victims as possible, aiming to grasp their firsthand experiences and learn how the system could have better prevented such catastrophes. However, after facing several denials, we realized the delicate nature of the subject. It became evident to us that empathy could be cultivated not only through direct interaction with the afflicted but also through comprehending the experiences and efforts of other stakeholders. This included those working to combat the issue, individuals living with the constant fear of imminent danger, as well as activists and researchers dedicated to preventing such incidents from recurring.


Biggest Setback

We put too much value on a the wrong group of people at the wrong time. During a significant part of our research process, my partner and I gained a profound understanding of the value and true essence of empathy. Initially, our plan was to engage with as many victims as possible, aiming to grasp their firsthand experiences and learn how the system could have better prevented such catastrophes. However, after facing several denials, we realized the delicate nature of the subject. It became evident to us that empathy could be cultivated not only through direct interaction with the afflicted but also through comprehending the experiences and efforts of other stakeholders. This included those working to combat the issue, individuals living with the constant fear of imminent danger, as well as activists and researchers dedicated to preventing such incidents from recurring.


The Design

The Design

Principals i set based on my research were:



Has to be extremely accessible and be WCAG AA/AAA certified



Has to have extremely short flows.



Has to overdo its expectations to actually be effective



Wireframes and User tests

Wireframes and User tests

1

3

4

Autoill is mandatory

2

IncludedStep by step

  • Most of our elderly users/ felt lost once first entering the app. They didn't know where to start nor what to do.

  • My colleague mentioned one of the new WCAG 2.2 requirements regarding autofill functionality. Implementing autofill in this app would greatly improve reporting speeds and reduce cognitive load for users.

The initial wireframes placed the ability to change between report types on the reporting screen itself. However, to avoid accidental privacy invasions, this feature was relocated to the settings screen.

Account setting was re organized

Users thought the 360° reporting voiceover would be jumbled due to the UI hierarchy

  • We though the more touching points the better. We were wrong


  • We minimized actions and focused on users only having their thumb on one button so itl easily be said to them


2

IncludedStep by step

  • Most of our elderly users/ felt lost once first entering the app. They didn't know where to start nor what to do.

3

Autoill is mandatory

  • My colleague mentioned one of the new WCAG 2.2 requirements regarding autofill functionality. Implementing autofill in this app would greatly improve reporting speeds and reduce cognitive load for users.

4

The initial wireframes placed the ability to change between report types on the reporting screen itself. However, to avoid accidental privacy invasions, this feature was relocated to the settings screen.

Account setting was re organized

1

  • We though the more touching points the better. We were wrong


  • We minimized actions and focused on users only having their thumb on one button so itl easily be said to them


Users thought the 360° reporting voiceover would be jumbled due to the UI hierarchy

The Final Products.

The Final Products.

Click here to test out the prototype

Click here to test out the prototype

Click here to test out the prototype

The Style Guide

Header 2 (Semibold) 16 pt

Header 1 (Medium) 22 pt

Main body text (Medium) 16 pt

Sec. body text (Regular) 14 pt

Button (Medium) 18 pt

Primary

Colors

Accent

Logo

Components

Application icon

Typography

8 px layout grid

60 px layout grid

4 column grid /

16 px margins

Grid + Spacing

Onboarding illustration

The Style Guide

Header 2 (Semibold) 16 pt

Header 1 (Medium) 22 pt

Main body text (Medium) 16 pt

Sec. body text (Regular) 14 pt

Button (Medium) 18 pt

Primary

Colors

Accent

Logo

Components

Application icon

Typography

8 px layout grid

60 px layout grid

4 column grid /

16 px margins

Grid + Spacing

Onboarding illustration

Primary

Colors

Accent

8 px layout grid

60 px layout grid

4 column grid /

16 px margins

Grid + Spacing

Application icon

Logo

Components

Header 2 (Semibold) 16 pt

Header 1 (Medium) 22 pt

Main body text (Medium) 16 pt

Sec. body text (Regular) 14 pt

Button (Medium) 18 pt

Typography

Onboarding illustration

The Style Guide

Things I’d do differently

Things I’d do differently

  1. Find empathy in different ways - Through our project, TERRAFIRME, we gained valuable insights into the search for empathy. However, we underestimated the challenges victims face in sharing their stories. In our future projects, we aim to identify all true stakeholders and prioritize learning from them. When interviewing victims, we intend to engage them during the final stages of research, ensuring we approach their experiences with extensive knowledge. This approach will allow us to better understand and respect their perspectives.

  2. Id spend more time perfecting - During the course of this project, we experienced significant gaps between our meetings due to initial time constraints that were later eased, we would go for weeks without communicating with our contractors. Nevertheless, the work continued and was refined. However, I believe that with the additional time, we could have taken it to a higher level of excellence and achieved even greater results.

  3. More user testing with individuals with disabilities- While we had the opportunity to conduct user tests with individuals with disabilities, we firmly believe that there can never be enough of such tests. The first two rounds of testing provided valuable insights, and I strongly believe that conducting four or more rounds would have ensured the highest possible levels of accessibility.



More projects...

2024


Adrian Santana

Let’s Connect!

2023

Adrian Santana

Let’s Connect!

2023

Adrian Santana